Friday 23 October 2009

On the importance of ethnicity

 One of the most misunderstood aspects of the debate on the BNP is the issue of how we define British. According the the UN charter, an ethnicity can define itself how it likes. There are no hard and fast rules and outsiders have no right to dispute or regulate the definition in any way. This is sensible.

The BNP does not define British ethnicity by skin colour. That is in the same way that the Chinese nation are not defined by skin colour, the Jewish nation is not defined by skin colour and neither is any ethnic nation. Skin colour is but a small detail amongst many making up and ethnicity. To make it entirely about skin colour can only mean that the many other aspects are rendered meaningless.

The British are ethnically northern European with the addition of shared language, history and culture. (We have had waves of northern European warriors adding to our genetic character and having a eugenic effect). This is because genetic studies show that these people share a relatively homogenous Germanic origin. The detractors of the BNP, on the other hand, wish to insist that the British are not a people and do not have ANY ethnicity which is a nonsense. It is known that there is far more genetic diverstiy in any African tribe by contrast, and yet an African tribe is a "people".

What is the consequence of having our right to be an ethnic people taken from us? The consequence is that we lose many rights and protections afforded legally to ethnic groups and so we would lose any claim to our country itself for example. (Excellent for the internationalist Capitalists). Also when our people are convinced by these arguments that we have no ethnic identity we lose our way as a people. "A people without a vision perishes" as the Bible says. And you can be sure that a people WITH a vision will take full advantage of our disarray. 

Golda Meir, once Prime Minister of Israel, made the remark that the Palestinians are "not a people" and this has been used as justification for Jews to take their land.

Our population in Britain today has such an apathetic death wish that I expect the response may well be to shrug, say "so what?!" and go and indulge in some kind of escapist painkilling degeneracy rather than face facts.

2 comments:

  1. A distinction must be made between being "civically" British and "ethnically" British. Anyone of any race can correctly claim to be British in the civic sense, if granted citizenship. But one cannot become ETHNICALLY British like that!

    ReplyDelete
  2. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of
    Indigenous Peoples

    Article 33
    1. Indigenous peoples have the right to determine their own identity or membership in accordance with their customs and traditions. This does not impair the right of indigenous individuals to obtain citizenship of the States in which they live.
    2. Indigenous peoples have the right to determine the structures and to select the membership of their institutions in accordance with their own procedures.

    What we stand to lose if we don't protect our ethnic identity.

    ReplyDelete